Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 10:43

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump airs frustrations with Xi and Jerome Powell over elusive economic goals - NBC News
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sun unleashes monster solar storm: Rare G4 alert issued for earth - ScienceDaily
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ford Stock Rises After Strong May Sales. The Pain Is Coming. - Barron's
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Flight attendant reportedly found naked during flight from SFO - SFGATE
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
China Rare-Earth Magnet Maker Gets Green Light for US Exports - Bloomberg
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What parts of the Bible, if any, are inappropriate to read to children? Why?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.